I think The OP must not have ticked the exclusive indicator for the access sequence against the table sir, hence system is picking two records which OP has maintained with two access( 05 and 30).
Parviz : Please update
thanks,
Srinu.
I think The OP must not have ticked the exclusive indicator for the access sequence against the table sir, hence system is picking two records which OP has maintained with two access( 05 and 30).
Parviz : Please update
thanks,
Srinu.